The Hidden Crisis: Seniors Left Without Long-Term Custodial Care in America

Many seniors in the U.S. require long-term care but cannot afford it, and do not meet the criteria for Medicaid assistance. The lack of a federal program to address these needs presents challenges for seniors and their families, who may need to reduce work hours or leave their jobs to provide care for their loved ones.

Joel Inocencio

5/21/20255 min read

🔥In the heart of America, a silent crisis brews, leaving our seniors stranded in a system that fails to meet their most basic needs.

Imagine an elderly woman, bed-bound, unable to afford the in-home care she desperately needs, her savings too meager to cover private costs, and her income just above the Medicaid threshold. Making her ineligible for financial assistance.

Her daughter, torn between love and livelihood, quits her job to become a full-time caregiver, sacrificing her career and financial stability.

This is not an isolated story but a growing reality for countless families across the United States, where no federally funded program universally covers long-term custodial care for seniors who don't qualify for Medicaid and can't pay out-of-pocket.

As the Trump administration pushes policies like no tax on tips and overtime to boost manufacturing jobs, the burden on families caring for seniors threatens to undermine these economic gains. Meanwhile, other countries offer models of hope that the U.S. could learn from—models that don't force families to choose between work and care.

The Plight of America's Seniors

The financial barriers are staggering for seniors requiring long-term custodial care and assistance with daily activities like bathing, dressing, or eating.

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the average annual cost of in-home care exceeds $60,000, far beyond the reach of many seniors living on fixed incomes. Medicaid, the primary safety net for long-term care, is means-tested, leaving those with modest savings or incomes just above the eligibility line in a precarious gap.

Often misunderstood as a solution, Medicare does not cover custodial care, focusing on short-term medical needs. Property taxes add another strain for seniors who own homes, eroding their ability to fund care. Social Security, a lifeline for many, often falls short of covering even basic living expenses, let alone care costs.

The human toll is profound.

Families, unable to afford professional care, step in, with adult children—often women—leaving the workforce to care for their loved ones.

A 2023 National Alliance for Caregiving study found that 53% of family caregivers reduced work hours or quit, leading to an average annual income loss of $10,000 or more. This destabilizes families and shrinks the labor pool, which is a critical concern as the Trump administration aims to stimulate employment through policies like eliminating taxes on tips and overtime.

These policies, designed to incentivize work in sectors like manufacturing, are undermined when caregivers are forced out of the workforce to fill gaps in the care system.

🏪A Policy Proposal: Tax Relief for Seniors

One immediate way to alleviate this burden is to exempt seniors needing long-term custodial care from Social Security and property taxes (for homeowners). Removing Social Security taxes would increase disposable income, allowing seniors to allocate more toward care costs.

For example, a senior receiving $24,000 annually in Social Security benefits could save approximately $1,800 in federal taxes, a modest but meaningful sum for hiring part-time in-home help. Similarly, waiving property taxes for senior homeowners could free up thousands annually, covering months of custodial care.

These measures would provide direct relief without requiring a complete overhaul of the care system, offering a lifeline to those in the Medicaid gap.

🌍The Global Contrast: Lessons from Abroad

The U.S. stands alone among developed nations in its lack of a universal, federally funded program for long-term custodial care. Countries like Japan, Germany, and the Netherlands have implemented systems that ensure seniors receive care regardless of financial status, offering lessons for American policymakers.

  • Japan's Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI): Since 2000, Japan's mandatory LTCI system has provided comprehensive care for those 65 and older, funded through premiums, taxes, and income-based co-payments. Seniors are assessed for need, not wealth, ensuring universal access to home care, day services, or institutional care. This system has reduced family caregiving burdens, making Japan's workforce robust despite an aging population.

  • Germany's Pflegeversicherung: Introduced in 1995, Germany's long-term care insurance covers all residents through payroll contributions. Benefits are tiered based on care needs, with minimal out-of-pocket costs for home care. This model supports seniors while enabling family members to stay employed, bolstering economic stability.

  • Netherlands' Long-Term Care Act (WLZ): The Netherlands funds care through taxes and income-based contributions, offering home care, institutional care, or personal budgets for seniors needing constant support. The WLZ's flexibility empowers seniors to choose services that fit their needs, reducing financial strain on families.

These systems share a common thread: they prioritize care as a right, not a privilege, funded through shared contributions rather than individual wealth. In contrast, the U.S. relies on a patchwork of private payment, Medicaid, and family sacrifice, leaving many seniors without care and their families in economic peril.

The Economic Ripple Effect

The absence of a federal long-term care program doesn't just harm seniors; it undermines broader economic goals.

The Trump administration's push for no tax on tips and overtime aims to boost employment, particularly in manufacturing, as tariffs increase demand for domestic labor.

Yet, when family caregivers—often in their prime working years—are forced to leave jobs, the labor market suffers. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that by 2030, the U.S. will need 8 million more workers to meet demand, a goal jeopardized by caregivers exiting the workforce.

Moreover, caregivers face long-term financial consequences, including reduced retirement savings and Social Security benefits, perpetuating a cycle of economic vulnerability.

A Call to Action

The U.S. must confront this crisis with bold, compassionate solutions. Beyond tax relief, policymakers should consider a federal long-term care insurance program, modeled after Washington State's Long-Term Care Trust Act, which funds care through a modest payroll tax.

Such a program could benefit all seniors needing custodial care, regardless of income, preventing families from choosing between work and care. In the interim, expanding funding for home and community-based services, as seen in the American Rescue Plan Act, could bridge the gap for those ineligible for Medicaid.

Small businesses and communities also have a role. Social enterprises, like virtual care platforms, can offer affordable alternatives to traditional care, while local governments can partner with non-profits to subsidize services. Seniors deserve dignity, and their families deserve the freedom to thrive, not just survive.

This crisis is not invisible—it's in our homes, communities, and economy. By learning from global models and acting decisively, the U.S. can ensure that no senior is left without care and no family is forced to sacrifice their future.

The time for change is now!

Sources:

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Long-Term Care Costs" (2024)

  • National Alliance for Caregiving, "Caregiving in the U.S." (2023)

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Employment Projections 2020–2030"

  • Japan Health Policy NOW, "Long-Term Care Insurance"

  • IAmExpat, "Long-Term Care Insurance in Germany"

  • Government.nl, "Long-Term Care Act (WLZ)"

  • Forbes, "Washington State's Long-Term Care Trust Act" (2019)

Concise Legal Disclosure

The content on this blog, including articles about natural supplements, holistic healthcare, disease prevention, and alternative treatments, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health-related decisions. The writer, publisher, and affiliates are not liable for any damages arising from the use of this content.

For full details, including indemnification and terms for third-party content, please see our Full Legal Disclosure.

Share Responsibly: Inspire others with holistic health insights, but always encourage professional guidance!